WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "2420f338-92f1-4dac-b72e-9eaee269a0d9"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 1, "id": "5201", "owners": [1], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "5201"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:senshu-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00005201", "sets": ["572"]}, "author_link": ["2129"], "item_10002_biblio_info_7": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "2011-03-15", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographicPageEnd": "98", "bibliographicPageStart": "91", "bibliographicVolumeNumber": "1", "bibliographic_titles": [{"bibliographic_title": "専修人間科学論集. 心理学篇"}]}]}, "item_10002_creator_2": {"attribute_name": "作成者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "岡田, 謙介"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "2129", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}, {"nameIdentifier": "10000804", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO著者ID", "nameIdentifierURI": " "}]}]}, "item_10002_description_25": {"attribute_name": "内容記述", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "Cronbach\u0027s alpha has been used as a golden standard reliability criterion. Although psychometricians have long been pointed out that the alpha is not the most appropriate way to examine reliability, the gap between psychometrics and psychology has impeded the application of other reliability measures. However, recently the interest has been growing many papers have published recommendations for alternative reliability measures. In this paper, we first review both classical and modern lower bounds of reliability. Then, these measures are demonstrated by the analysis of several artificial and real datasets. The results coincided with the findings of Revelle \u0026 Zinbarg (2009) in that ωt is the most recommended lower bound.", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_10002_heading_23": {"attribute_name": "見出し", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_heading_banner_headline": "専修人間科学論集第1巻第1号", "subitem_heading_language": "ja"}]}, "item_10002_identifier_registration": {"attribute_name": "ID登録", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_identifier_reg_text": "10.34360/00005195", "subitem_identifier_reg_type": "JaLC"}]}, "item_10002_publisher_26": {"attribute_name": "公開者", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_publisher": "専修大学人間科学学会"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_28": {"attribute_name": "ISSN", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "2185-8276", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "ISSN"}]}, "item_10002_source_id_29": {"attribute_name": "書誌レコードID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_source_identifier": "AA12515444", "subitem_source_identifier_type": "NCID"}]}, "item_10002_title_1": {"attribute_name": "別言語のタイトル(英)", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "Beyond Cronbach\u0027s alpha : A review and empirical comparison of reliability coefficients"}]}, "item_10002_version_type_20": {"attribute_name": "出版タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_version_resource": "http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43", "subitem_version_type": "NA"}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "2012-06-08"}], "displaytype": "detail", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "011_22.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "325.3 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_free", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 325300.0, "url": {"label": "011_22", "url": "https://senshu-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/5201/files/011_22.pdf"}, "version_id": "e4fdcc07-aa47-4bc8-816c-4d54ff5d22d7"}]}, "item_keyword": {"attribute_name": "キーワード", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_subject": "Kensuke", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Okada", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "reliability", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "Cronbach\u0027s alpha", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "lower bounds", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}, {"subitem_subject": "real data analysis", "subitem_subject_language": "en", "subitem_subject_scheme": "Other"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "jpn"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "departmental bulletin paper", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]}, "item_title": "クロンバックのα係数とは何だったのか : 信頼性係数のレビューと実データ分析", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "クロンバックのα係数とは何だったのか : 信頼性係数のレビューと実データ分析"}]}, "item_type_id": "10002", "owner": "1", "path": ["572"], "permalink_uri": "https://doi.org/10.34360/00005195", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "2011-05-25"}, "publish_date": "2011-05-25", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "5201", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["クロンバックのα係数とは何だったのか : 信頼性係数のレビューと実データ分析"], "weko_shared_id": -1}
クロンバックのα係数とは何だったのか : 信頼性係数のレビューと実データ分析
https://doi.org/10.34360/00005195
https://doi.org/10.34360/000051952fe813da-1ce8-4ee0-a408-71664455863e
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
011_22 (325.3 kB)
|
|
Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2011-05-25 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | クロンバックのα係数とは何だったのか : 信頼性係数のレビューと実データ分析 | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | jpn | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題 | Kensuke, Okada, reliability, Cronbach's alpha, lower bounds, real data analysis | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
ID登録 | ||||||
ID登録 | 10.34360/00005195 | |||||
ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
別言語のタイトル(英) | ||||||
タイトル | Beyond Cronbach's alpha : A review and empirical comparison of reliability coefficients | |||||
作成者 |
岡田, 謙介
× 岡田, 謙介 |
|||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述 | Cronbach's alpha has been used as a golden standard reliability criterion. Although psychometricians have long been pointed out that the alpha is not the most appropriate way to examine reliability, the gap between psychometrics and psychology has impeded the application of other reliability measures. However, recently the interest has been growing many papers have published recommendations for alternative reliability measures. In this paper, we first review both classical and modern lower bounds of reliability. Then, these measures are demonstrated by the analysis of several artificial and real datasets. The results coincided with the findings of Revelle & Zinbarg (2009) in that ωt is the most recommended lower bound. | |||||
公開者 | ||||||
出版者 | 専修大学人間科学学会 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子 | 2185-8276 | |||||
書誌レコードID | ||||||
収録物識別子 | AA12515444 | |||||
書誌情報 |
専修人間科学論集. 心理学篇 巻 1, p. 91-98, 発行日 2011-03-15 |
|||||
出版タイプ | ||||||
出版タイプ | NA |