{"created":"2023-07-25T10:30:56.348613+00:00","id":4480,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"3d7df3ed-7c02-471e-ad43-c4d2bfa689d2"},"_deposit":{"created_by":1,"id":"4480","owners":[1],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"4480"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:senshu-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004480","sets":["27:32:314:508:509"]},"author_link":["1830","1829","1832","1828","1831"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2015-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"1","bibliographicPageEnd":"94","bibliographicPageStart":"75","bibliographicVolumeNumber":"10","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"専修ビジネス・レビュー"},{"bibliographic_title":"Senshu Business Review","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_creator_2":{"attribute_name":"作成者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"渡邊, 隆彦"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"田澤, 元章"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"久保田, 隆"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"阿部, 博友"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"田中, 誠和"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{}]}]},"item_10002_description_25":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"OECD 外国公務員贈賄防止条約の加盟国は米英日を含め40カ国を超え,外国公務員贈賄防止規制は国際的に強化されている。米国は海外腐敗行為防止法（FCPA）を外国企業の米国外における行為にも積極的に域外適用しており,日本企業も巨額の罰金等を科されている。英国の贈収賄禁止法（Bribery Act）も広汎な域外適用の可能性を有する。日本は外国公務員贈賄罪の執行を強化し,日本企業の処罰に関し他国と管轄権が競合する場合には,他国と協議・協力する体制を構築していかなければならない。そのためには,外国法人に対する適用範囲の明確化,違法収益没収権限の確立など,いくつかの課題がある。\n外国公務員贈賄防止においては,企業のコンプライアンス・プログラムの実施が,各国執行当局により奨励されている。しかし,その法的意義及び位置づけは,各国において異なる。米国には起訴前及び量刑においてコンプライアンス・プログラムを考慮する制度的仕組みがあるが英国及び日本にはないこと,また,法人の刑事責任につき米国は代位責任理論を採用するのに対し英国及び日本は同一視理論を採用すること等が理論的に関連している。\n : More than 40 countries have ratified OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. US aggressively enforces Foreign Corruption Practices Act（FCPA）extraterritorially, and many foreign companies outside US are targeted by the Department of Justice. UK enacted the Bribery Act of which section 7 has possibility of extreme extraterritorial application. Japan needs to improve enforcement of anti-corruption law and to establish a way to cooperate foreign governments, however, there are some problems to be resolved.\nThe law enforcement authorities encourage companies to implement the compliance program concerning anti-corruption. The legal function of the compliance program would be different in each country. This would be explained by the circumstances as follows. Concerning the corporate criminal liability, while US adopts vicarious liability theory, UK and Japan adopt identification principle. Only US has an institutionalized mechanism to consider the compliance program in determining prosecution, DPA, NPA and sentencing.","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.34360/00004474","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_10002_publisher_26":{"attribute_name":"公開者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"専修大学商学研究所"}]},"item_10002_source_id_28":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1880-8174","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_source_id_29":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA12145571","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_10002_title_1":{"attribute_name":"別言語のタイトル(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"Issues on Extraterritorial Application of FCPA and UK Bribery Act and Function of the Compliance Program in Legal Context : Comparative Study on US, UK and Japan"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"出版タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_be7fb7dd8ff6fe43","subitem_version_type":"NA"}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2015-05-14"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"3052_0010_09.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.0 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_note","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"3052_0010_09.pdf","url":"https://senshu-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/4480/files/3052_0010_09.pdf"},"version_id":"7d9cc177-768f-40fa-b7ad-37d20e0e97de"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"外国公務員贈賄","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"FCPA","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Bribery Act","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"域外適用","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"法人の刑事責任","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"コンプライアンス・プログラム","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Takahiko","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Watanabe","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Motoaki","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Tazawa","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Takashi","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Kubota","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Hirotomo","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Abe","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Seiwa","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Tanaka","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"FCPA","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Bribery Act","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Anti-corruption","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"extraterritorial application","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"corporate criminal liability","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"compliance program","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"米国FCPA 及び英国Bribery Act の域外適用と企業のコンプライアンス・プログラムの法的意義 : 米英日の比較","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"米国FCPA 及び英国Bribery Act の域外適用と企業のコンプライアンス・プログラムの法的意義 : 米英日の比較"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"1","path":["509"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"公開日","attribute_value":"2015-05-14"},"publish_date":"2015-05-14","publish_status":"0","recid":"4480","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["米国FCPA 及び英国Bribery Act の域外適用と企業のコンプライアンス・プログラムの法的意義 : 米英日の比較"],"weko_creator_id":"1","weko_shared_id":1},"updated":"2023-07-25T12:53:22.710348+00:00"}